PENGARUH KONFLIK TERHADAP KINERJA PERAWAT PADA RSUD ARIFIN ACHMAD PEKANBARU

Penulis

  • Hidayat Syahputra Universitas Brawijaya
  • Djumahir Djumahir Universitas Brawijaya
  • Kasman Arifin Universitas Brawijaya

Kata Kunci:

Conflict, Task based conflict, Relationship based conflict, Time based conflict, Strain based conflict, Behavior based conflict, Performance

Abstrak

Nursing is a job that frequently needed these days. Therefor the management where the nurses work should maintain and develop the nurse’s skill. The main task of a nurse is to give care to a patient and speed up the convalescene process. Because having a very dinamic job as a nurse, it is necessary for a nurse to have a good physical condition, therefor, a nurse will automaticly experience physical exhaustion, emotional exhaustion, and mental exhaustion. Job as a nurse are very stressful. From one side, a nurse must run their task that concern other peoples life. On the other side, a nurse phycological condition must also persistently controlled. In the condition like this can easily evoke the feel of under pressure, so that he or she are easily experience stress. This study uses quantitative method by using respondent from the nurses department at RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru as much as 88 samples that were taken by random cluster sampling. While data analisys method  were using double linear regression model. The result of this study shows that proven Task based conflict (x1), Strain based conflict (x4), and Behavior based conflict (x5) givi a great significant influence towards the nurse work performance. This means that H0 is rejected, it shows that the three variable partialy influental significantly towards the nurse work performance. While the Time based conflit (x2) and relationship based conflict (x3) does not give any significant influence towards the nurse work performance. While the regression coefficient to each of this variable shows that the most influental variable to the nurse work performance at RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru were the Task based conflict factor.

Perawat merupakan satu jenis profesi yang dewasa ini banyak dibutuhkan. Oleh karena itu, organisasi tempat para perawat bekerja senantiasa megusahakan peningkatan kualitas profesionalisme mereka. Tugas pokok seorang perawat adalah merawat pasien untuk mempercepat proses penyembuhan. Seorang perawat, karena pekerjaannya yang dinamis, perlu memiliki konsidi tubuh yang baik, sehat, dan mempunyai energy yang cukup. Kondisi tubuh yang kurang menguntungkan akan berakibat seorang perawat mudah patah semangat bilaman saat bekerja ia mengalami kelelahan fisik, kelelahan emosional, dan kelelahan mental. Pekerjaan seorang perawat sangatlah berat. Dari satu sisi, seorang perawat harus menjalankan tugas yang menyangkut kelangsungan hidup pasien yang dirawatnya. Di sisi lain, keadaan psikologis perawat sendiri juga harus tetap terjaga. Kondisi seperti inilah yang dapat menimbulkan rasa tertekan pada perawat, sehingga ia mudah sekali mengalami stress. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terbukti Konflik Tugas (X1), Konflik Tekanan (x4) dan Konflik Perilaku (x5) memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Ini menunjukan bahwa H0 ditolak, berarti secara parsial ketiga variabel tersebut berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Sedangkan Konflik Hubungan (x2) dan Konflik Waktu (x3) tidak memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja, sedangkan koefisien regresi untuk masing – masing variabel ini menunjukan bahwa variabel ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel yang paling mempengaruhi kinerja karyawan RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru bagian Keperawatan adalah faktor Konflik Tugas.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Aryee, S., Luk, V., Leung, A., & Lo, S. (1999). Role stressors, interrole conflict, and well-being: The moderating influence of spousal support and coping behaviors among employed parents in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 259-278.
Bernadin, H.John and Russel, Joyce E.A. 1998. Human Resouces Management 2nd Edition : An experiential Approach. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Co.,Singapore
Callister .,et al. 1995. Organizational Behavior: Prentice Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
De Dreu C.K. W .2003 Task Versus Relationship Conflict , Team Performance and Team Member Satisfaction : Meta Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 88 No, 4. 741-749.
Faustino Cardoso Gomes.2003.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Penerbit Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Friedman.Raymond, 2000. What goes Around Comes Around: The Impact Of Personal Conflict Style on work Conflict and Stress, Vol 11. International Journal Of conflict Management.
Francisco J Medina at al. 2005.type of intragroup conflict and affective reactions. Journal of managerial psychology Vol.20
Foley, S., & Powell, G. N. (1997). Reconceptualizing work-family conflict for business/marriage partners: a theoretical model. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(4), 36-47.
Gibson, James at.al. 1996. Organization Behavior, Structure and Process, Terjemahan oleh Nunuk Andriani, Lydon Saputra, Binarupa Aksara. Jakarta
Gutek, B., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560-568.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
Henry L. Tosy, 1990. Managing Organization Behavior, Prentice Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value- based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management 5, 223-238.
Kevin D. Bradford. 2001Managing Conflict to Improve the Effectiveness of Ad- Hoc Marketing Teams. Academy of Management Journal.
Kossek, E. and Ozeki, C. 1998, Work- Family Conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship: A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research', Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,139-149.
Kinicki, Angelo & Robert Kreitner,. 2003. Organizational Behavior: Key Concept, Skills & Best Practises. Chicago. McGraw-Hill. Irwin
Looker, Terry and Olga Gegson, 2005. Managing Stress. Alih Bahasa Aris Setiwati. BACA. Yogyakarta.
Lewis, S. and Cooper, C. L. (1987) Stress in two-earner couples and stage in the life cycle,Jounal of Occupational Psychology, 60 289-303.
Luthans, Fred. 1992. Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill, Inc. Singapore
Menzies IEP. 1960 Nurses under stress. Internatl Nurs Rev;7:9-16
Masri Singarimbun.1995. Metode Penelitian. Bumi Aksara
Mathis Robert L & John H., Jackson,2004. Human Resources Management, Thompson. south Western
McShane, SL. Von Glinow,MA. 2003. Organizational Behavior: Emerging Realistic for The Work Place Revolution. Me Graw Hill. Irwin
Robbins, Stephen P, 2003, Perilaku Organisasi, Alih bahasa Benyamin Molan, Gramedia, Jakarta.
Santrock, J. W. 2004. Life span development. New York: MeGraw Hill, (ms 1-64).
Schermerhorn, at al, 2001. Management For Productivity. John wiley & Sons Inc. Singapore.
Siagian Sondang P, 1993. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi aksara,Jakarta.
Sud arm ay anti.2001 .Sumberdaya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja, CV Mandar Maju. Bandung.
Sugiono, 2005. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Alvabeta Bandung
Suharsimi arikunto, 2005. Manajemen Penelitian. Edisi Revisi. Rineka Cipta Jakarta.
Towner, Lesley, 2002. Managing Employee Stress, Alih Bhasa Andre. PT. Elex Media Komputindo. Jakarta.
Wahyudi.2006. Manajemen Konflik Dalam Organisasi. Penerbit Alvabeta, Bandung
Winardi, 1994. Manajemen Konflik. CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2018-12-22